From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <d9e315033475dcf3423c8fee04e618b6@yourdomain.dom>
From: steve-simon@ntlworld.nospam.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] porting from vs. porting to Plan 9
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 16:36:25 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 70c00784-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Mmmm, I tend to agree.

I lived with sam on HPUX under X, then sam under
windows/cygwin, until just this year I managed to
get real plan9 on my work desktop (hurray!).

For me, running plan9 apps under *nix again would be
a depressing retrogade step.

However being able to write code for and on plan 9 and
then just re-compile it with a library for Windows and
X11 would be wonderfull.

If we could do that using a plan9 hosted gcc
cross compiler so much the better (and no I'am not offering :-).

That would only leave the web-browser...

-Steve