From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] XML-RPC: Cope with large integers on x86-64
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:12:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da068fc16e59978651cc48bca463426d@proxima.alt.za> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44289F79.9000501@us.ibm.com>
> I see this as a temporary solution until
> we can sanitize the XML-RPC functions and get rid of all the
> S-Expression stuff.
Now, was that what drove Ron away from Xen?
I find it hard to follow the mailing list and especially the breakneck
speed with which they seem to be advancing. I can only presume it is
modelled on Linux development, it certainly seems to clash violently
with the NetBSD and Plan 9 cultures of caution and backwards
compatibility.
No principle of least surprise in their department :-)
++L
parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-28 5:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <44289F79.9000501@us.ibm.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da068fc16e59978651cc48bca463426d@proxima.alt.za \
--to=lucio@proxima.alt.za \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).