From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:07:04 -0500 From: quanstro@quanstro.net To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Swap considered harmful (Sorry) In-Reply-To: <44B67020.2010002@lanl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7e5ad414-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 otoh, on the low end with *ix, it seems to be a requirment, given how programs are written. on my 128MB linux box, running X and gcc will pound the swap file. run firefox, and i'm suprised that the hd doesn't glow. - erik On Thu Jul 13 11:12:24 CDT 2006, rminnich@lanl.gov wrote: > Brantley Coile wrote: > > >>From: "rob pike" <;rob@plan9.bell-labs.com>; > >>Subject: Re: [9fans] Virtual memory in BSD and Plan9 > >>Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 07:38:17 -0500 > >> > >>I'm a radical here, but I think if a machine is paging, you've lost. > > This has been the rule in the high end for a long time. > > Sadly, now that people are embedding python in their fortran apps (I am > not making this up), they're starting to demand paging, not realizing > what they're doing to themselves. > > Ah well. > > ron