From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:52:50 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <dab76e88828e373ecd0944f220279ee5@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <201104241610.06016.0intro@gmail.com>
References: <201104240344.27289.errno@cox.net>
	<63d88c3d38162974e6c68ebc13f86f8d@ladd.quanstro.net>
	<201104240431.33591.errno@cox.net>
	<201104241610.06016.0intro@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] kfs and cwfs comparison
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d34babce-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Apr 24 10:11:16 EDT 2011, 0intro@gmail.com wrote:
> kfs is a local and single-user file server without any archiving mechanism.

s/single-user //

it may have been at one time, but kfs does handle multiple users.
(as long as strlen(username)>1.  i'm surprised anthony hasn't complained. ☺)

- erik