From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <db2ee7a8105e55024837b675b3f9410e@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [9fans] any reason not to have srv in namespace?
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 20:07:57 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 86247d54-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Now that we got `.' in namespace, I'm wondering if
there's any reason not to have srv there too.

We had to add a srv command and some mount & binds to our termrc
despite that smelling to a namespace(6) thing.