From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 13:51:12 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <db996ef0e5b8d1128aabea87533e7c17@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100519171832.72D915B8A@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <AANLkTimnauJCe1L9wv2486QRyadj93iXYxw6CFUNv8Ib@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTilMzzQJoZDF87_8Ft_WYtfFnYTC_alNpWgzh9Mc@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100519054035.C71DB5B63@mail.bitblocks.com>
	<AANLkTingHUitJY-xmooV5ZdpMAHtfMgoFSm0jHez6eOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100519171832.72D915B8A@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] system call trace version of 9vx available.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 27b1017e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > 			if (cmd[0] != '/') {
> > 				char* pcmd = malloc(strlen(cmd) + 5);
> > 				sprintf(pcmd, "/bin/%s", cmd);
> > 				exec(pcmd, args);
> > 			}

shouldn't that be

 			if (cmd[0] != '/')
				exec(smprint("/bin/%s", cmd), args);

with no silly stdio?

- erik