From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:03:13 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <dbf3468ae2dc87ad0fb0e9cf3b0e96f5@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120823175325.EEF27B85B@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <d67c46cd156233f61e9381a31c62269d@rei2.9hal>
	<d1c7d7362524b9375ba8e19c51dfd265@kw.quanstro.net>
	<CAOw7k5ii5PoYZnEbDeUuhR9GsgEEGt7i+XTQm7FR9+r=ENg=xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120823175325.EEF27B85B@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] devmnt crash, fix.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: af4f5f44-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> the sleeper actually runs -- the above condition is not
> violated as the new process won't be sleeping. But if yet
> another process tries to access the same condition, it will be
> blocked on getting the rendezvous structure lock?

in plan 9 sleep, only 1 sleeper is allowed.

- erik