From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <dc918a9f868a1f89dc38e75df33d2d48@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] acme fonts
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
In-Reply-To: <1c4d664e18600d859e4064225b709a9a@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:29:35 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6f1dde9c-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> but code looks so much prettier in proportionally spaced fonts!

Agree. It's just tabs. Probably doing what other has suggested,
i.e., making tab width to calculate xpos as if it were constant width,
could fix that.