From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 04:43:54 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <38C1E109-2459-4711-8038-240857CE08E1@gmail.com> References: <38C1E109-2459-4711-8038-240857CE08E1@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Reading gmail Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8c511622-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon May 14 23:58:41 EDT 2012, mveety@gmail.com wrote: > > On May 14, 2012, at 11:51 PM, John Floren wrote: > > > > If you have a large number of messages, Erik's "nupas" is useful; IIRC > > it will cache messages locally so you don't have to download a ton of > > headers each time you start upas. > > > > However I've found that with both old upas and nupas, there are some > > messages that make them choke. Sadly I can't remember what triggered > > it. > > > > john > > > > My 16,000 message inbox usually make nupas and upas shit the bed. I've never had specific messages kill it though. the nupas core should be ok with 16k messages minooka; mail -f bigmbox 45465 messages, 44899 unread : q on the other hand, i can easily believe the imap mailbox type can't handle this. i haven't used imap mailboxes much, and when i did, they were very small. if you have specific ideas, and or observed problems, i'd be glad to incorporate them. - erik