From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:30:53 -0800
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <dcd94f25d3cb5020d74b5e8c0496f1ce@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAOw7k5iKUN627cKY8NUpoCWaFM_wcNTHK6LEvNyVtewiKdxb+Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOw7k5gZWWiGA+MJVksHUuNj8b+Dvz1NLUAJEdf1_B4Df7OMXg@mail.gmail.com>
	<7ef5897118148acd265fac9b434f8684@felloff.net>
	<CAOw7k5i5Hbw=vLCD1YGo7pbpXSyKMtmu0qboxB1ybX1nQZNGTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<6DF5FD14-1141-48D6-9A87-04966521E332@ar.aichi-u.ac.jp>
	<CAOw7k5iKUN627cKY8NUpoCWaFM_wcNTHK6LEvNyVtewiKdxb+Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] bug in exportfs
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 847a52ea-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Yes, although that convention isn't in Plan 9, and it might be worthwhile
> reconsidering how and why it is used.
> If for configuration files, perhaps they should be stored elsewhere; if for
> access control (eg, .htaccess), perhaps
> groups would be better, with dynamic group membership providing the effect
> of an access control list.

sadly among its other sins, the plan 9 webserver does use .httplogin

- erik