From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a0810181020n4136964cr17c2f8aa05839573@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:20:09 -0700
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9port lacks exportfs server
In-Reply-To: <1223351034.19902.17.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1223158526.466.10.camel@ginkgo>
	 <ee9e417a0810060924p7db19386s8b28dbc1ed2254b2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1223351034.19902.17.camel@goose.sun.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 208fc9cc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Hence the question -- would you be in favor
> of continue adding things as needed. And
> if so, what kind of of groundwork would
> you expect from the contributors?

Usually it is as simple as adding it to your own tree,
adapting the mkfile, and making it build.
U9fs is somewhat special since it is not a
Plan 9 program.  You can probably simplify things
quite a bit by making it use the Plan 9 calls.

Russ