From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a0901102307g6c9a4febpea45d22a25eeeda1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:07:45 -0800
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] a bug in awk?
In-Reply-To: <1f008c20c3fcaf5ebcc59a63642a32fb@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <1f008c20c3fcaf5ebcc59a63642a32fb@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7fafe87e-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> is there some reason that the regular strtod is unsuitable for
> ape?

for one thing, the regular (= plan 9 libc) strtod doesn't set errno.

russ