From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d1c554290907300930o523c248h7336550e3329cae5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f75780240907300828s1ddeeb13laee217ebeb2a31e6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <dd6fe68a0907300908k3bd5edd2mb4094c4e88d12170@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d1c554290907300930o523c248h7336550e3329cae5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:44:37 -0700
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a0907301344p388c6837te3f29beaaec6991f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9p question
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3335546a-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> it would surely make it easier for unix implementations. i have had
> plenty of issues with that in o9fs.
>
> but as yourself pointed out, what would that walk mean?

as i also pointed out, there's no problem if
the walk is creating a new fid.  it would be unopened.

russ