From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <81344dc3bb1137ca2e54684d0f5d55ef@quanstro.net>
References: <73d734eff7a63db5f42b7fe5210f93fc@quanstro.net>
	 <81344dc3bb1137ca2e54684d0f5d55ef@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue,  1 Sep 2009 16:22:57 -0700
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a0909011622l20f9e6abv2f3ebf75254b3e1e@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] lowest valid stack address
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5df1caf8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I believe that the Stack line in /proc/$pid/segment
tells you the lowest possible stack address, not
the amount in use right now.  I looked in the kernel
source and tried it in 9vx and it confirms my belief.
I don't have a Plan 9 kernel to try it on right now,
so maybe I'm wrong.

Do you have two different /proc/$pid/segment
with different lowest stack addresses on the Stack line?

Russ