From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx as a perfect proto environment
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:14:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a0909271014h61edb82en9e0475c61f154ca3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <13426df10909251740m365600e1kf98a14d09b82ff5c@mail.gmail.com>
> It's fast. But the big beauty of it for me is that in vx32/src/9vx/a
> is pretty much a plan 9 kernel in plan 9 C vernacular. I just spent an
> easy short time prototyping some new stuff that I can now drop into a
> real plan 9 kernel for Blue Gene, no changes needed. The
> edit/build/test boot cycle is measured in seconds. The fact that we
> have a friendly path via codereview(1) and bitbucket is the icing on
> the cake.
This is definitely one of my favorite things about 9vx.
It's a great environment for doing kernel hacking.
> [comments about instability]
I don't think there's any inherent reason why 9vx must be unstable,
but it certainly has a couple bugs. I haven't had the time to track
them down and fix them, but I'm always happy to point in the
right direction if you can reproduce one. There have been a
few reports about it dying with cryptic errors from vx32. I'd like
to track those down but a reproducible test case is an absolute
requirement for the gritty low-level code at the bottom.
The fact that 9vx works as well as it does has always made me
feel like I was cheating. It feels like it should be impossible
or at least much harder, and yet there it is, and most things run.
Russ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-27 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 0:40 ron minnich
2009-09-26 0:47 ` Lyndon Nerenberg - VE6BBM/VE7TFX
2009-09-30 14:23 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-09-30 18:45 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-01 0:19 ` Ethan Grammatikidis
2009-10-01 3:53 ` lucio
2009-09-26 11:31 ` Richard Miller
2009-09-26 14:52 ` blstuart
2009-09-26 15:29 ` Mathieu L.
2009-09-26 18:45 ` Tim Newsham
2009-09-30 20:47 ` Mathieu L.
2009-09-27 17:14 ` Russ Cox [this message]
2009-09-27 17:52 ` blstuart
2009-09-28 12:01 ` Iruata Souza
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd6fe68a0909271014h61edb82en9e0475c61f154ca3@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rsc@swtch.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).