From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <39c07e49b526d6c5a585ef6e2d2aa9d8@coraid.com>
References: <4B57048D.6040002@maht0x0r.net>
	 <58dec826cbba066ea2cf1362ffa28e96@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	 <429BB192-1F75-44F3-AC67-730F152E4C29@gmail.com>
	 <9c614339d11833003968916e4dff66bb@coraid.com>
	 <41CF4DC9-7F76-4902-8F8A-28A477A798DE@gmail.com>
	 <dd6fe68a1001200947k2ac6758by9fa1f701371bdecf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <39c07e49b526d6c5a585ef6e2d2aa9d8@coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:11:26 -0800
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a1001201211q462b2f3dg90ad062ec31fb0b5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Are we ready for DNSSEC ?
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c1c680fa-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:17 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com> wrote:
> On Wed Jan 20 12:49:14 EST 2010, rsc@swtch.com wrote:
>> > starting over would seem (and probably is) best.
>>
>> http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
>
> you have a design then that will
> do dnssec without any rewriting?

i certainly think it can be done without starting over from scratch.

russ