From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Are we ready for DNSSEC ?
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:11:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a1001231711u6157bbdcv42c564722749b9de@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8094c7f53bad7b2e0bed09ec4bfd41dc@ladd.quanstro.net>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 5:01 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
>> if the goal is avoiding ssl mitm attacks,
>> dns is the least of your worries. a mitm will
>> just take over the connection attempt for the
>> actual ip address. the solution there is
>> to implement proper ssl certificate chain checking.
>
> doesn't work with the recent renegotiation bug.
disable renegotiation.
> but i don't
> think one can dismiss dns as a non-issue.
dns is a non-issue if the rest of ssl is working.
dns is irrelevant if it isn't.
russ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-24 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 13:26 maht
2010-01-20 13:42 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 15:14 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-20 15:33 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 16:39 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-20 16:49 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 17:29 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-20 17:47 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-20 18:17 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 20:11 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-20 19:13 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-23 23:59 ` John Barham
2010-01-24 0:42 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 0:52 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 1:01 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 1:11 ` Russ Cox [this message]
2010-01-24 1:18 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 13:19 ` hiro
2010-01-24 14:57 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 21:49 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 22:12 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-24 22:20 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 18:14 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-25 20:45 ` Wes Kussmaul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd6fe68a1001231711u6157bbdcv42c564722749b9de@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rsc@swtch.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).