From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5cf02fd3b416bf1db1b7c58217511630@yyc.orthanc.ca>
References: <b5e37becf9e504113a9352ff3ca2dfac@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	 <5cf02fd3b416bf1db1b7c58217511630@yyc.orthanc.ca>
Date: Mon,  8 Feb 2010 10:48:14 -0800
Message-ID: <dd6fe68a1002081048u78e20310x53906c8bc85d6189@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] NaN, +Inf, and -Inf, constants?
From: Russ Cox <rsc@swtch.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d0773ffe-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

we could spend a lot of time debating proposed
changes, but i think it's fine to leave as is.
there appears to be a good, justifiable reason
for it, and it's already implemented.

russ