From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <df49a7370812040656o61714cc6x77961d50ad2c1d5d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu,  4 Dec 2008 14:56:08 +0000
From: "roger peppe" <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <5f37b0148ff579ae7660653961a9dde0@plan9.cs.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <599f06db0812040407g59ee4feejc79ce8ecdec30451@mail.gmail.com>
	<599f06db0812040426u435f5a9dx7c1c0209c333db53@mail.gmail.com>
	<5f37b0148ff579ae7660653961a9dde0@plan9.cs.bell-labs.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] initialization of anonymous structs.
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 58ee81b4-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:33 PM, Sape Mullender
<sape@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> B bvar = {
>        .B = {
>                .a1 = 2,
>                .b1 = 2,
>        },
> };

that doesn't work for me.
i get:
x.c:18 structure element not found B
x.c:18 more initializers than structure: bvar

changing the .B to .A doesn't work either, nor does
{.A = {.a1 = 3}, .b1 = 4}
which intuitively (without looking at the compiler code) seems the
most likely to work...