9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Small program "PlanKey" (paraphrase of DOSKey)
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:04:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <df49a7370901290504q767a482aib350ab3594a46fb5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <509071940901290350w103904c6rea469880f7dac12e@mail.gmail.com>

2009/1/29 Anthony Sorace <anothy@gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 3:49 AM,  <cej@gli.cas.cz> wrote:
>> How about turning acme to universal UI, in the style of old Oberon?
[...]
> I love acme, but I think rio's the right starting place for GUI
> things. Maybe just move the menu into a pre-populated tag, similar to
> Acme's.

i might have said this before, i can't remember, but i
reckon that rather than making acme universal, you could just
make it multi-window. currently there are many Column data
structures and a single Row. it *might* not be so hard to
allow multiple Rows, each corresponding to a window.

i'd find this very useful - my acme gets too cluttered when
i start subtasks, but i don't wish to start another acme, as it's
useful having all files under the same instance, and amenable
to the same Dump.

there is of course the issue of which window to open plumbed
files in, but i imagine (as with much of acme) that a decent heuristic
could make it feel fairly natural.

then you can have a separate terminal window with searchable
text as a free bonus.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-23 10:03 pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-23 10:50 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-23 11:27   ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 11:35 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 12:56 ` roger peppe
2009-01-23 14:14   ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-26 12:41     ` cej
2009-01-26 10:31   ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:29   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  3:42     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27  4:43       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  6:35         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27  6:44           ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27 20:01           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 20:10             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:01               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:26                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:58                   ` sqweek
2009-01-27 23:42                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28  0:35                 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-28  5:59                   ` lucio
2009-01-28 19:00                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28 22:19                     ` Joel C. Salomon
2009-01-28 22:51                       ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-29  0:26                         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29  2:09                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29  8:49                             ` cej
2009-01-29 11:50                               ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-29 13:04                                 ` roger peppe [this message]
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` cej
2009-01-29 16:14                                   ` jimmy brisson
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 15:20                                   ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 16:40                                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:52                                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 17:03                                       ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 17:09                                         ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-01-27  7:09     ` Russ Cox
2009-01-27 22:12       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:25         ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:31           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:43             ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:50               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 23:11                 ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 23:40                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-28  3:15                     ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-28  7:22                     ` Eris Discordia
2009-01-27 23:01         ` sqweek
2009-01-26 10:31 ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:21 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  9:37 ` Pavel Klinkovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=df49a7370901290504q767a482aib350ab3594a46fb5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rogpeppe@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).