From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.64.0907290712090.20861@malasada.lava.net>
References: <df49a7370907290157u44aa95ebv588fcbd6b023c404@mail.gmail.com>
	<832c87e4aa20e86ae6651751b91821b3@quanstro.net>
	<df49a7370907290727m438abc4bx82dc6b0345d64731@mail.gmail.com>
	<df49a7370907290749k337f523fo9dcd8ea3c691e28d@mail.gmail.com>
	<3096bd910907290907i9206eak9c7220d2e469513e@mail.gmail.com>
	<df49a7370907290928k34cf18cbne8773dd4bdde035@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.BSI.4.64.0907290712090.20861@malasada.lava.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:34:12 +0100
Message-ID: <df49a7370907291034s3b149927iede158fd9936baad@mail.gmail.com>
From: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] vmware installation problems
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 31915780-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

it's the latest version of VMWare Fusion AFAIK...

2009/7/29 Tim Newsham <newsham@lava.net>:
>>> This problem is only with plan9?
>>
>> yup.
>> although it is plan9-inside-vmware, which could make
>> a significant difference.
>
> And you said VMWare 2.x, which is exceedingly old...
>
> Tim Newsham
> http://www.thenewsh.com/~newsham/
>
>