From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <13426df10909221147w665e30adt93b6121281294647@mail.gmail.com> References: <13426df10909211129n33481db3gb0ddf024cd67d90a@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10909221027u4279cd72hf7b651dfd120339b@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10909221121g5d203f06qeabf4356940d1193@mail.gmail.com> <13426df10909221147w665e30adt93b6121281294647@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:58:47 +0100 Message-ID: From: roger peppe To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx (is this the right list)? import issue Topicbox-Message-UUID: 757354ee-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 2009/9/22 ron minnich : > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:35 AM, roger peppe wrote: > >> surely the correct way to go about this (caveat: i haven't looked at the code) >> is to drop the rpc struct onto the rpcfree list only when the Rflush is >> received? > > you just got an Eintr. Did the request get sent? doesn't Eintr mean that the write did not complete? if it's ambiguous, then the tag should indeed be put on hold, because there's no way to get it right. it would be useful to see a log of the actual 9p messages.