From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3e7b6e1bef809d34385dcee260bdb7db@coraid.com>
References: <9001.1266527667@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu>
	<3e7b6e1bef809d34385dcee260bdb7db@coraid.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 23:08:30 +0000
Message-ID: <df49a7371002181508x4e2b9942g6663404121f18ab1@mail.gmail.com>
From: roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] pineview atom
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d6d5eada-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 18 February 2010 22:38, erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com> wrote:
> indirection? =C2=A0executable code being turned into illegal
> instructions? =C2=A0it's not 100% efficiency but it will translate
> flipped bits into crashes.

i'm interested - does anyone know what a typical relative
percentage of pointer- vs. non-pointer-valued memory is?

it might be interesting to find out.