* [9fans] import and p9p
@ 2009-01-21 1:47 erik quanstrom
2009-01-21 1:54 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-21 3:29 ` Russ Cox
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: erik quanstrom @ 2009-01-21 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9fans
i apologize for the silly question, but
my p9p-fu is quite weak.
is the reason that plan 9 import is not
part of p9p other than it was not needed?
(of course the ssh-based import is included,
but i believe that is something else entirely.)
i'm not dead set on import, but i do require
authentication and will be talking to a cpu
server, not a fs.
- erik
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] import and p9p
2009-01-21 1:47 [9fans] import and p9p erik quanstrom
@ 2009-01-21 1:54 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-21 3:29 ` Russ Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roman V. Shaposhnik @ 2009-01-21 1:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:47 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> i apologize for the silly question, but
> my p9p-fu is quite weak.
>
> is the reason that plan 9 import is not
> part of p9p other than it was not needed?
> (of course the ssh-based import is included,
> but i believe that is something else entirely.)
>
> i'm not dead set on import, but i do require
> authentication and will be talking to a cpu
> server, not a fs.
I had a very similar question about export (and there's
a chance I'll port it for some of the stuff that I do)
so not having import provides a nice symmetry at least ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [9fans] import and p9p
2009-01-21 1:47 [9fans] import and p9p erik quanstrom
2009-01-21 1:54 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
@ 2009-01-21 3:29 ` Russ Cox
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russ Cox @ 2009-01-21 3:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> i apologize for the silly question, but
> my p9p-fu is quite weak.
>
> is the reason that plan 9 import is not
> part of p9p other than it was not needed?
it was not needed, and it's not nearly as useful
as the plan 9 one, since the access to 9p
servers is so crippled.
also, you'd need to get tls working.
russ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-21 3:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-21 1:47 [9fans] import and p9p erik quanstrom
2009-01-21 1:54 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-21 3:29 ` Russ Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).