From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  1 Jun 2013 00:00:28 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <df86505869f0f7f2d0440a7457e12e6d@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAGGHmKEEs96bBBLhU9qWK9A4sA8rbURs4JARdcA1MBqZyQJNkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOr72miC+-2+K1OXco4Ykz5BDnMJjfY9NPaaMx=yTYAwns3ONg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGGHmKHv62Ug5hWFkb6r1FraAL00XRrNFvSrGjMy1KrUJqAOTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130531200615.GA91523@intma.in>
	<CAGGHmKEEs96bBBLhU9qWK9A4sA8rbURs4JARdcA1MBqZyQJNkQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e511834-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I suspect it's probably an artifact of any serious filesystem I use on a
> daily basis (*cough*) measured in years are all based on 64-bit Ken's.
> Fossil still feels foreign to me, though I'm attempting to change that.

ken's file server sure has that industrial-strength feel, doesn't it?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wyman_Gordon_50000_ton_press.jpg

- erik