From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:10:45 -0400 To: charles.forsyth@gmail.com, 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <68ce90976b22bdb0929ccccafef4b7d0@kw.quanstro.net> <3330200.XJjoRb8JbZ@blitz> <5538fcd345a73fc294c6ee568f2fcdb4@kw.quanstro.net> <8ee568439e1855124564ecf0e83ac2b3@kw.quanstro.net> <6c7d84f203a2cc4f3427e177e34fa9d9@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] rc's shortcomings (new subject line) Topicbox-Message-UUID: b5360138-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Aug 30 16:08:23 EDT 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote: > That's true, but the C compiler also does each .c in parallel up to NPR= OC. >=20 > On 30 August 2012 18:18, erik quanstrom wrot= e: >=20 > > > Even more common than reduce is map. No reason why you can't > > > parallelize > > > > > > 8c *.c > > > > we already do=E2=80=94with mk. ha! i hadn't seen that before. too bad mk doesn't (generally) use it. - erik