From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:17:10 -0700 From: "Christopher Nielsen" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Thoughts about Plan 9 development, UAT, and production. In-Reply-To: <32a656c20705110325u72eea02emb2b0a35f47282375@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <32a656c20705110325u72eea02emb2b0a35f47282375@mail.gmail.com> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 663f14ca-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 i find it fine the way it is, but i haven't been submitting any patches recently. On 5/11/07, Vester Thacker wrote: > Would it be beneficial to have public accessible revision control > servers for Plan 9 development and UAT? > > I`m interested in the developers` thoughts about access, revision > control, and moving forward as a community. Are people having a > problem with the present model? If so, then what are your suggestions > for improvements? > > Uriel, this isn`t intended as an opportunity for you or anyone else to > rant. I want to know what everyone else thinks for a change. :) > > If all is well, I`d like to know that too. > > Regards, > Vester > -- Christopher Nielsen "They who can give up essential liberty for temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin