9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christopher Nielsen <cnielsen@pobox.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Small program "PlanKey" (paraphrase of DOSKey)
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:15:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e0ac85f90901271915j4ba5a331o7da36d0320e0e978@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233099626.22808.361.camel@goose.sun.com>

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 15:40, Roman V. Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:
> You told me to check the archives ;-)

So I did. Maybe our definitions of 'pissing contest' differ.

> And you lied too.

I did?

> How adorable.

I aim to please and entertain.

> Now, if you have something constructive to say, please say it.
> If the only reason you came here is to get the kids off your
> lawn -- just beat it old man. Eris has more sense in what she
> posts here.

Old man? I don't think I resemble that remark.

It seems we've gotten off on the wrong foot. Communication can be
tricky through email. There's no sense in hurling insults at me. I
don't think I did anything to deserve that.

By no means do I feel that anyone is 'unworthy' of using Plan 9 or
gaining 'wisdom' from it. I try to encourage any and all interested in
using, developing, and taking away lessons from it, to do so. I am of
the mind that code speaks louder than endless pontification, and that
reading the source and list archives can answer a lot of questions. In
the case of Plan 9, reading the source is also a joy because it's easy
to follow.

Is that constructive enough for you?

--
Christopher Nielsen
"They who can give up essential liberty for temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin



  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-28  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-23 10:03 pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-23 10:50 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-23 11:27   ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 11:35 ` Pietro Gagliardi
2009-01-23 12:56 ` roger peppe
2009-01-23 14:14   ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-26 12:41     ` cej
2009-01-26 10:31   ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:29   ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  3:42     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27  4:43       ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  6:35         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27  6:44           ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-27 20:01           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 20:10             ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:01               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:26                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-27 22:58                   ` sqweek
2009-01-27 23:42                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28  0:35                 ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-28  5:59                   ` lucio
2009-01-28 19:00                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-28 22:19                     ` Joel C. Salomon
2009-01-28 22:51                       ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2009-01-29  0:26                         ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29  2:09                           ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29  8:49                             ` cej
2009-01-29 11:50                               ` Anthony Sorace
2009-01-29 13:04                                 ` roger peppe
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` cej
2009-01-29 16:14                                   ` jimmy brisson
2009-01-29 13:53                                 ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 15:20                                   ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 16:40                                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-29 16:52                                     ` erik quanstrom
2009-01-29 17:03                                       ` Akshat Kumar
2009-01-29 17:09                                         ` Brian L. Stuart
2009-01-27  7:09     ` Russ Cox
2009-01-27 22:12       ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:25         ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:31           ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 22:43             ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 22:50               ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-27 23:11                 ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-01-27 23:40                   ` Roman V. Shaposhnik
2009-01-28  3:15                     ` Christopher Nielsen [this message]
2009-01-28  7:22                     ` Eris Discordia
2009-01-27 23:01         ` sqweek
2009-01-26 10:31 ` pavel.klinkovsky
2009-01-27  3:21 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-01-27  9:37 ` Pavel Klinkovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e0ac85f90901271915j4ba5a331o7da36d0320e0e978@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=cnielsen@pobox.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).