From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e17842438481b3cdd19b769706354b38@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] suggestion: avoiding out of date binaries
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <f529df46e1e55bfc99f46e442a9c58d3@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 03:32:10 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b22e2b66-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

For non-386 binaries, you are on your own.
As Geoff points out, you are also on your own
for non-386 compilers, loaders, and assemblers.

In both cases the theory is that almost no one uses
them, so they're not worth the space they take up.
The first case is more defensible than the second.

Russ