From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e1864c6beb27b8a7ef769e39c82cf0ef@juice.thebigchoice.com>
From: matt@juice.thebigchoice.com
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: [9fans] (no subject)
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 01:43:39 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6d037f86-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu, cruft, debugging, Subject:
From: matt
To: Subject:, debugging, cruft, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: matt@proweb.co.uk
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 01:43:39 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

As much as I appreciate what plan9 is and how it gets maintained I must object to the debugging cruft that is collecting in the source code.

It seems I can't fail to stumble across uncommented printfs attempting to diagnose unspecified errors.

On the other hand, keep up the good work :)

/sys/src/cmd/srv.c

void
ignore(void *a, char *c)
{
	USED(a);
fprint(2, "%s\n", c);
	if(strcmp(c, "alarm") == 0){