9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Giacomo Tesio" <giacomo@tesio.it>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] dbfs and web framework for plan 9
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:13:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1d437a40811240613k32f9f66ch151fd76986c9ecd5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <492A88DD.2070900@proweb.co.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1961 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:58 AM, matt <mattmobile@proweb.co.uk> wrote:

>
>  That's exactly what constraints, rules in SQL etc are for. Maybe some
>> similar ruling system for filesystems would be fine :)
>> (any suggestions ?)
>>
>>
> That's what I was driving at. To map SQL <> FS you end up replicating lots
> of SQL logic in your client FS. Reads are *always* out of date. Writes can
> happen across tables but need to be atomic and able to roll back.
>

Probably I was not clear on what I'm thinking about.

I think that rebuild a relational database on a filesystem is (quite)
pointless.


What I'm proposing is to design/develop the interface to interact with
(any?) rdbms through a filesystem.

A kind of "proxy" to the db with a filesystem interface.

A "draft" could be (even if I've already found some problems in it):


>    - a "ctrl" file which accept only COMMIT, ROLLBACK and ABORT
>    - an "error" file
>    - a "notice" file (postgresql has RAISE NOTICE... may be others have it
>    too)
>    - a "data" file (append only in the transaction, but not outside) where
>    the INSERT, UPDATES, DELETE and all the DDL and DCL commands will be written
>    - each SELECT have to be written in a different file (named
>    sequentially): after writing the query, the same file could be read to get
>    the results (in xml...)
>    - on errors, sequents writes fails and error file will be readable
>
> The problems:

   - transaction -> directory conversion require creating a new connection
   to the backend (if I'm right thinking that transaction are connection wide)
   - xml output of fetchable results (SELECT, FETCH, SHOW...) require a tool
   to easily query such an output. It seem Plan 9 miss such a tool. xmlfs
   actually is unsuitable.
   (I'm thinking about an xpath command accepting xml in stdin and the xpath
   query as an argument, and return to stdout the results)


Giacomo

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2937 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-24 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-23 18:58 [9fans] dbfs and web framework for plan 9 (was: web-based plan 9?) Giacomo Tesio
2008-11-23 22:06 ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-11-23 22:26   ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2008-11-23 22:50     ` Enrico Weigelt
2008-11-24  9:27   ` Giacomo Tesio
2008-11-24  9:30     ` Giacomo Tesio
2008-11-24 10:58   ` [9fans] dbfs and web framework for plan 9 matt
2008-11-24 14:13     ` Giacomo Tesio [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e1d437a40811240613k32f9f66ch151fd76986c9ecd5@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=giacomo@tesio.it \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).