From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e1f8aac63d8e07da82b8087ba219ebac@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 09:04:05 +0100
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinBBf-YOMTRZqtuzMxQOsKpikqj5JNqJbZ-jIg5@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] standalone terminal w/ kfs no fossil
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 24394e8e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The computer has a 100 MHz CPU with
> some 48 MB RAM. fossil hogs all
> processing power. kfs on the other hand
> is wonderfully stable and low maintenance.

kfs limits filenames to 28 characters, which can be a source of
irritation if you import files or save mail attachments from other
systems.

fossil (even without venti) gives you snapshots, which can be very
useful if you ever make mistakes.

For me, those two factors alone make up for any disparity in
performance.