From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Suggestion: Programming Tutorial for /sys/doc From: erik quanstrom Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:00:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8aef47ed8a0ff383045c0f3a16c71712@plan9.bell-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: e6ccfb48-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > The new 9load works on all the machines I was able to test it on, > including booting from USB flash disks and SATA disks, in AHCI and > non-AHCI modes. The only way it's going to work for more people is if > the community at large uses it and helps me to understand why it > doesn't work on particular machines. i think the new 9load is a good idea and it's nice to have more booting options. the problem is no actual testing is going on. when folks can't get the livecd booting, that's pretty much the end of the road for them. there are very limited debugging options and there is very little useful information gained from the failure. > Although the BIOS booting code is generating the most error messages, > the panics are likely due to interactions with AHCI. i believe none of machines with reported failures in the past day have ahci support. (qemu, nforce 55) also, the machines seem to be failing when accessing the cdrom which should be accessable in legacy mode. anyway, what is the answer for folks who are having problems with the current livecd? - erik