From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000d01cacf40$936a6340$ba3f29c0$@com> References: <20100325114948.GA7249@polynum.com> <8AB033EC-13D4-4BD3-A70F-B9CE7D724238@fastmail.fm> <2653D5E1-ADDE-4351-8DE1-896D490DED68@fastmail.fm> <000b01cacf1f$3d25e570$b771b050$@com> <1E47E1C7-F15B-4295-9B7F-F1CFA96508AB@fastmail.fm> <000c01cacf39$729037a0$57b0a6e0$@com> <000d01cacf40$936a6340$ba3f29c0$@com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:23:32 +0100 Message-ID: From: Connor Lane Smith To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] Man pages for add-ons Topicbox-Message-UUID: f7a40a76-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 29 March 2010 14:05, Patrick Kelly wrote: > I was speaking strictly in terms of binary management within the system. Does no one understand what context is? A package manager's main duty is to handle repositories and dependencies. If we're looking at nothing more than management of local binaries then yes, systems without it get along fine. But if you look at the bigger picture it becomes obvious why a package manager is necessary and isn't just for "systems that are already a mess." This is called putting things in context. Thanks, cls