From: Wes Kussmaul <wes@ReliableID.com>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 in Brazil
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 13:43:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2a81ab2-c651-3fbb-aa07-91c6b3e5cf63@ReliableID.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15987219330.b686Dfb.13471@composer.9fans.topicbox.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1449 bytes --]
On 8/29/20 1:25 PM, Leonardo wrote:
> I really don't understand why Plan 9 has not been adopted. Legacy base?
By giving a lot of control to the user Plan 9 and its derivatives
undermine the Silicon Valley business model, which is built upon
breaking into your information home, taking your personal intellectual
property, and putting it on their balance sheets as a money making
asset. In other words, burglary and theft.
--
Please note that my presentation at the International Cryptographic
Module Conference ICMC 2020
<https://icmconference.org/?session=measuring-the-reliability-of-an-identity-claim-g13c>
has been rescheduled to September 16.
*Wes Kussmaul*
*Reliable Identities, Inc.*
an Authenticity Enterprise
738 Main Street
Waltham, MA 02451 USA
t: +1 781 790 1674
m: +1 781 330 1881
e: wes@ReliableID.com <mailto:wes@ReliableID.com>
Learn About Authenticity <http://authenticityworks.video/>
This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise
protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have
received it by mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it
from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose its contents
to anyone. The integrity and security of this message cannot be assured
unless it is digitally signed by the PEN of an identity certificate with
an IDQA score that is sufficient for your purposes.
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 4815 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.2: ICMC20Acronym80x23.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 4241 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-29 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-02 8:52 Iruatã Souza
2020-05-02 16:31 ` [9fans] " Robert Sherwood
2020-08-29 17:25 ` Leonardo
2020-08-29 17:43 ` Wes Kussmaul [this message]
2020-08-29 18:36 ` Leonardo
2020-08-29 19:51 ` Wes Kussmaul
2020-08-29 21:10 ` Kurt H Maier
2020-08-29 19:54 ` Iruatã Souza
2020-08-29 21:03 ` Lucas Francesco
2020-08-29 22:09 ` Iruatã Souza
2020-08-31 2:52 ` Leonardo
2020-08-29 21:19 ` Lucas Francesco
2020-08-29 22:04 ` Iruatã Souza
2020-08-30 16:53 ` Leonardo
2020-08-30 19:40 ` Iruatã Souza
2020-08-31 1:29 ` Leonardo
2020-08-31 1:32 ` Kurt H Maier
2020-08-31 2:03 ` Leonardo
2020-08-29 21:30 ` ori
2020-09-01 11:52 ` Ethan Gardener
2020-09-01 12:10 ` hiro
2020-09-01 12:19 ` Ethan Gardener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e2a81ab2-c651-3fbb-aa07-91c6b3e5cf63@ReliableID.com \
--to=wes@reliableid.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).