9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] [OT] domain socket support in open(2) on unix
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:08:31 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2aeab7618511196f68789de082c2020@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0305201737060.31416-100000@fbsd.cpsc.ucalgary.ca>

> absolutely not: plan 9 is a non-unix system, the license sucks and the
> community is closed and elitist.
>
> notice how none of those have anything to do with the technical merit of the
> operating system?

They don't need to pay too much attention to the present status as is,
which may lead deep innovation in a sense of technology.
Am I wrong? ?

Kenji



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-20 22:03 William Ahern
2003-05-20 22:42 ` boyd, rounin
2003-05-20 23:27   ` ron minnich
2003-05-20 23:32     ` boyd, rounin
2003-05-20 23:35     ` Russ Cox
2003-05-20 23:42       ` boyd, rounin
2003-05-21  0:08         ` Dan Cross
2003-05-21  0:40       ` northern snowfall
2003-05-20 23:38     ` andrey mirtchovski
2003-05-21  0:46       ` [9fans] Re: [Way OT] " Jim Choate
2003-05-21  1:08       ` okamoto [this message]
2003-05-21  1:23         ` [9fans] [OT] " andrey mirtchovski
2003-05-21  1:33           ` ron minnich
2003-05-21  1:33           ` Geoff Collyer
2003-05-21  2:38           ` okamoto
2003-05-21  3:47             ` [9fans] The Future of OS's & P9 (was: Re: [OT] domain socket support in open(2) on unix) Jim Choate
2003-05-21  4:47               ` Lucio De Re
2003-05-21 10:59                 ` boyd, rounin
2003-05-21 11:27                 ` Jim Choate
2003-05-21 16:46                   ` Lucio De Re
2003-05-21 16:50                     ` boyd, rounin
2003-05-20 22:55 ` [9fans] [OT] domain socket support in open(2) on unix Geoff Collyer
2003-06-08 16:02 ` Russ Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e2aeab7618511196f68789de082c2020@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp \
    --to=okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).