From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lyndon@orthanc.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:26:13 -0800 Subject: [9fans] time zones In-Reply-To: <1c521cd511f78003599e3766706af445@coraid.com> Message-ID: Topicbox-Message-UUID: c527b682-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > if it weren't done this way, then the dstpairs would be > unique to the timezone. each timezone would require > a unique list of dstpairs. The files are small (each will fit in a single fs block, for whatever your favourite fs is), but the header line makes each one unique anyway, so there's no saving in disk space for, say, venti. It just seems odd that that GMT wasn't the obvious base for these values. Having spent a couple of years living inside the caldav mess, I have an intense loathing of DST to begin with ... But simplicity would seem to trump here, no? Fixing ctime.c to deal with GMT is trivial, vs. trying to screw your head around which (non-)DST timezone you're referencing as you walk though those files? Is it Friday? I need a pint of Old Peculiar. Ooooh -- tomorrow is April 1. Let's punt this conversation for 24 hours. (Or is that 23? :-)) --lyndon