From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil/venti From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: <32908.138.89.177.17.1072511532.squirrel@www.infernopark.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:47:08 +0900 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: b027f0da-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 > - plan 9 installation is getting complex. the easiest one i did was the > first free version (just a standalone system with kfs). as features are > added, it getting tougher. I agree, and that is the reason why I posted my example for someone who will have the same problem, too. Complicated, because we have three kinds of file servers, and the last one, which is expected to active now, is still in the progress. If you = just want to try Plan 9, you can choose kfs version, because it's easier. > - i think kfs file system is needed anyway atleast till fossil kernel i= s > built and the config files are modified accordingly. it is not possible= or > easy to setup fossil/venti without kfs. am i right? If you don't have working Plan 9 network, I think you need kfs system first, from which you can fill the things into venti archive disk.=E2=98=BA > (instead of > installation-process-assisted fossil installation).=20 I don't know this. Is there? > I used to feel I am just a end-user to Plan 9.=20 Looks like so.=E2=98=BA Kenji