From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e3dcc9f8ae743b2a4fa61b0d9ab81fb1@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: RE: [9fans] libhtml vs. <pre> tags
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:35:34 -0700
From: Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BD3BB8D47F9DE4984C319EA325A006DC4009C@nj9620exch003u.mh.lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9ed4046e-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Tables have always been a complete bitch in rendering HTML. Part of the=
 problem is that it is easy to inconsistently overspecify a table (e.g., =
the whole table must have width 3in but there are only two columns each o=
f which must have width 2 in), and you have to experiment with, say, Inte=
rnet Explorer, to see how it resolves the problem.

one would think that knuth had solved it for =CF=84=CE=B5=CF=87. any of i=
t applicable to html?