From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:51:47 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9150ae98-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > I saw your CL, but I think your description is a bit too concise, I > can't quite get my mind around it. Has anyone consulted with Bell > Labs and tried to convince them to add Bgetle* and Bputle* in libbio, > yet? I have a feeling that a clean patch (I'm sure I have one handy) lucho, as explained before we think this is a *BAD* idea. macros are generally avoided. especially long complicated ones like those. > PS: Why the hell is there no Bgetbe* and Bputbe*? because it's just a micro speed hack for the compiler. i don't think they're thinking of maintaining libbio as a system library. there are reasons not to use this as libbio. - erik