From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e4e9ea21d106243b41dfb07d29bcfca9@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:41:26 -0500
To: csant@csant.info, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] dir tree Qs
In-Reply-To: <op.tefvaxd8d84skq@fiore.malebolge>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a28ef4aa-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

i think it's a holdover from research unix. "network."

- erik

On Thu Aug 17 12:39:22 CDT 2006, csant@csant.info wrote:
> > rog@vitanuova.com wrote:
> >>> /n is remote servers. /mnt/is local.
> >>   /mnt/term ?
> >
> > yeah, I think that is a tenuous claim (/mnt vs. /n)
> >
> > I always figured it was that stuff in /mnt was supposed to be in /mnt,  
> > otherwise if it was in /n, it was supposed to be in /n?
> 
> 	/n/dump
> is yet another one confusing me. If /mnt stands for "mount", what does /n  
> stand for?
> /c