From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e510e47e0704020549n274836f0l648e719fc154db4c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  2 Apr 2007 09:49:32 -0300
From: "pedro henrique antunes de oliveira" <ph.rpguo@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] slow performance
In-Reply-To: <20070402094517.GE11896@suckless.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_99270_19822506.1175518172757"
References: <20070402093109.GD11896@suckless.org>
	<69f0ed122149a92a1496f346e75bf51c@terzarima.net>
	<20070402094517.GE11896@suckless.org>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3c217584-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

------=_Part_99270_19822506.1175518172757
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Well, i really dont know why i didnt test the version using buffered output.
But i've tested it now, and the program takes only almost 5 secs. well,
seems that the problem was the 'lot' of calls that pint() makes (in that
case).

i'll check the DMA and i think that the problem is solved.

thank you all.

------=_Part_99270_19822506.1175518172757
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Well, i really dont know why i didnt test the version using buffered
output. But i&#39;ve tested it now, and the program takes only almost 5
secs. well, seems that the problem was the &#39;lot&#39; of calls that pint()
makes (in that case).<br>
<br>
i&#39;ll check the DMA and i think that the problem is solved.<br>
<br>
thank you all.<br>

------=_Part_99270_19822506.1175518172757--