From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: To: 9fans@9fans.net From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:09:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e56da44-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > You misspelled unstable. You have more sack than I could ever say I have for putting anything mildly important on fossil. Nonsense. I've been using fossil on my main system since 2008, and on a thinkpad which I used daily when working at clients' offices for some years before that. My professional livelihood depends on the integrity of those file systems, and I've never lost a file in an active partition -- apart from two or three "human error" instances like typing 'mv x y' when I meant 'mv y x', or inadvertently starting two simultaneous fossils on the same partition. I have had some damage in historical dumps, but that bug was fixed in March 2012.