From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri,  8 Jan 2010 23:33:12 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <e60630d68a98db545d7a0179eca85cd4@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <599f06db1001082029s135f9a17ve666fc7a09a9b046@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100108094014.GA16595@machine>
	<599f06db1001082029s135f9a17ve666fc7a09a9b046@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] libthread API
Topicbox-Message-UUID: bb270ff8-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Fri Jan  8 23:31:23 EST 2010, paurea@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:40 AM, anonymous <aim0shei@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > Why libthread has threadcreate instead of something like fork? With
>
> Preemptive vs cooperative.

i think that misses the point of the question.  the question
could have just as easily been why not proccreate instead of
fork.

- erik