From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:43:40 -0400 From: jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] linux il/ip In-Reply-To: <5c56564016f8e5c037e36adc796f70a8@quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: a9f0cfd4-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 il is dead, deal with it. if you like i'll remove it from the distributed code. ken tried to put tcp into the old fileserver and gave up in disgust. On Tue Aug 29 15:53:57 EDT 2006, quanstro@quanstro.net wrote: > i'm not sure il's completely moot. has anybody done any tcp vs il performance > measurements on gigabit or 10 gigibit networks, including cpu usage? > > the fact that it doesn't route well over the internet shouldn't be too much of a > bother most of the time. my only problem is that of all the protocols that linux > choose to implement, il wasn't one of them. ;-) > > - erik