From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e723225c6010f7a5755fc4d889f87f5b@juice.thebigchoice.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] spam
From: matt@proweb.co.uk
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309240821260.26417-100000@maxroach.lanl.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:37:56 -0400
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 468bae1e-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> > import -bp machine /mail/box
>> > mail user
>>
>> a disadvantage of this approach is ...
>
> if you can import it, you can already cpu to the machine. I'm not sure
> it's an issue.

if you can cpu to the machine then why not utilise that machines smtp system which respects the users pipefrom and other configuration options ?