From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  6 Feb 2010 23:44:41 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <e75ecaade32da4958c9e9795f314ddeb@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <f75780241002061902n613c642ax882ecad9140117bd@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20100206161207.GA31545@centaur.acm.jhu.edu>
	<dd6fe68a1002061612u754bf41ic04fbcfa2c2f2b4b@mail.gmail.com>
	<f75780241002061902n613c642ax882ecad9140117bd@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] kenfs question?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cf132cc2-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I guess I wasn't clear; what I was asking was why it was safe to
> attempt to take a lock when splhi() at all.

because the rule is you can't sleep when holding a lock.

- erik