From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Barrelfish
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:15:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e763acc10910171815j6d43cff9vabc7ad560405391e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091015105328.GA18947@nipl.net>
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Sam Watkins <sam@nipl.net> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 06:50:28PM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>> > The mention that "... the overhead of cache coherence restricts the ability
>> > to scale up to even 80 cores" is also eye openeing. If we're at aprox 8
>> > cores today, thats only 5 yrs away (if we double cores every
>> > 1.5 yrs).
>
> Sharing the memory between processes is a stupid approach to multi-processing /
> multi-threading. Modern popular computer architecture and software design is
> fairly much uniformly stupid.
It is. But what's your proposal on code sharing? All those PC
registers belonging to
different cores have to point somewhere. Is that somewhere is not shared memory
the code has to be put there for every single core, right?
Thanks,
Roman.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-18 1:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-14 19:09 Tim Newsham
2009-10-14 19:54 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-14 21:21 ` Tim Newsham
2009-10-14 21:33 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2009-10-14 21:42 ` Noah Evans
2009-10-14 21:45 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-14 21:57 ` Noah Evans
2009-10-14 22:10 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-14 22:21 ` Noah Evans
2009-10-15 1:03 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-15 1:50 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-15 2:12 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-15 10:53 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-15 11:50 ` Richard Miller
2009-10-15 12:00 ` W B Hacker
2009-10-16 17:03 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-16 18:17 ` ron minnich
2009-10-16 18:39 ` Wes Kussmaul
2009-10-17 12:42 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-15 11:56 ` Josh Wood
2009-10-15 13:11 ` hiro
2009-10-15 15:05 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-18 1:15 ` Roman Shaposhnik [this message]
2009-10-18 3:15 ` Bakul Shah
[not found] ` <e763acc10910180606q1312ff7cw9a465d6af39c0fbe@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-18 13:22 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-18 19:18 ` Bakul Shah
2009-10-18 20:12 ` ron minnich
2009-10-20 0:04 ` [9fans] Parallelism is over a barrel(fish)? Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX)
2009-10-20 1:11 ` W B Hacker
2009-10-14 21:36 ` [9fans] Barrelfish Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-15 2:05 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-15 2:17 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-15 3:32 ` Tim Newsham
2009-10-15 3:59 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-15 17:39 ` Tim Newsham
2009-10-15 18:28 ` Christopher Nielsen
2009-10-15 18:55 ` W B Hacker
[not found] <<20091015105328.GA18947@nipl.net>
2009-10-15 13:27 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-15 13:40 ` Richard Miller
2009-10-16 17:20 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-16 18:18 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2009-10-19 15:26 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-19 15:33 ` andrey mirtchovski
2009-10-19 15:50 ` ron minnich
2009-10-16 21:17 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-17 20:58 ` Dave Eckhardt
2009-10-18 2:09 ` Jason Catena
2009-10-18 16:02 ` Dave Eckhardt
2009-10-17 18:45 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-17 21:07 ` Steve Simon
2009-10-17 21:18 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2009-10-18 8:48 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-18 8:44 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-19 15:57 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-19 16:03 ` ron minnich
2009-10-19 16:46 ` Russ Cox
2009-10-20 2:16 ` matt
2009-10-20 9:15 ` Steve Simon
2009-10-21 15:43 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-21 16:11 ` Russ Cox
2009-10-21 16:37 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-21 18:01 ` ron minnich
2009-10-28 15:37 ` matt
[not found] ` <A90043D02D52B2CBF2804FA4@192.168.1.2>
2009-10-18 0:06 ` ron minnich
2009-10-18 0:54 ` Roman Shaposhnik
[not found] <<207092dc429fe476c2046d537aeaa400@hamnavoe.com>
2009-10-15 13:52 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-15 15:07 ` David Leimbach
2009-10-15 15:21 ` roger peppe
2009-10-16 17:21 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-16 23:39 ` Nick LaForge
2009-10-18 1:12 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2009-10-19 14:14 ` matt
2009-10-19 16:00 ` Sam Watkins
[not found] <<4AD70EE9.1010208@conducive.org>
2009-10-15 13:52 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<3e1162e60910150805q2ea3f682w688299a39274051c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-15 15:28 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<20091016172030.GB3135@nipl.net>
2009-10-16 18:34 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<d50d7d460910161417w45b5c675p8740315aaf6861f@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-16 22:25 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<20091018031508.717CE5B30@mail.bitblocks.com>
2009-10-19 13:44 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-19 14:36 ` David Leimbach
[not found] <<20091019155738.GB13857@nipl.net>
2009-10-19 16:05 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-19 16:34 ` Sam Watkins
2009-10-19 17:30 ` ron minnich
2009-10-19 17:57 ` W B Hacker
2009-10-19 18:14 ` David Leimbach
[not found] <<4ADC7439.3060502@maht0x0r.net>
2009-10-19 16:13 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-19 18:23 ` tlaronde
2009-10-20 1:38 ` matt
2009-10-20 1:58 ` Eris Discordia
2009-10-20 2:17 ` matt
[not found] <<20091019182352.GA1688@polynum.com>
2009-10-19 18:48 ` erik quanstrom
[not found] <<4ADD147A.4090801@maht0x0r.net>
2009-10-20 2:11 ` erik quanstrom
2009-10-20 2:33 ` matt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e763acc10910171815j6d43cff9vabc7ad560405391e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=roman@shaposhnik.org \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).