From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1fc0d9800911112031n24c47aa6i8722e1c67f110a74@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1fc0d9800911112031n24c47aa6i8722e1c67f110a74@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:27:13 -0800
Message-ID: <e763acc10911112127s799410f5i4de40337d499d73e@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 99c0e636-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Nick LaForge <nicklaforge@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Roman V Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:
>
>> Personally I think you'd be better off exploring a connection that a
>> language called Lua has to C. In the immortal words of Casablanca it
>> just could be "the begging of a beautiful friendship".
>
> Well, it was nice while it lasted.

Huh? I'll agree with you when Go grows a VM. And even then things like
... and multi-values (which, of course, are only possible in a dynamically
typed language) will keep me interested.

Speaking of VMs (and Limbo) -- I'm wondering if Go is eventually going
to have it anyway. Any reason not to?

Thanks,
Roman.