From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <e9284d1f6067e2cbe2bf5dd137ff6e6e@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri,  2 May 2008 15:31:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080502173332.7497C1E8C3A@holo.morphisms.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] another dusty upas question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9d9729ac-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>> ☺.  i found it by reading the source.  i was trying to track
>> down all the places where mailboxes are fidded in the upas
>> source.
>>
>> it does seem very wierd and marshal does a shimmy to
>> pull it off.  it would seem the only way to file outgoing
>> & incoming mail to/from the same person in the same
>> file.
>
> ah, so the nedmail rf command invokes marshal -F.
> i would be inclined to change -F to take the name
> of the file, so that nedmail can be the sole arbiter of
> what goes where.

there's one problem with that.  marshal saves a copy of the
email after all the attachments have been made.

i can't replicate this easily with -C.

echo x | upas/marshal -C quanstro/quanstro -s y quanstro/z
Mail  from 'quanstro'
to 'quanstro/quanstro' alias `local!quanstro/quanstro'
failed with error 'unknown user'.

- erik